Head to head
AquaFunded vs Bulenox
Bulenox grades higher overall, 6.8 to 3.4. Across 21 measurable rows, AquaFunded comes out ahead on 3 and Bulenox on 12.
Cheap challenges wrapped in a dense, shifting rulebook and a damaged reputation
Cheap futures evaluations with real payouts, but an unpublished flipping rule decides who gets paid
Key differences
In short
- Bulenox has the stronger payout record (7.7 vs 0.0).
- AquaFunded carries more hidden-rule risk (6.9 vs 4.4), led by: floating-loss caps close accounts instantly.
- Bulenox allows more capital ($750,000 vs $400,000).
- Only AquaFunded sells 2-step programs.
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker, Tradovate, TradingView are only available at AquaFunded.
- Rithmic, Quantower are only available at Bulenox.
AquaFunded vs Bulenox, side by side
The better value in each row is marked
| Criterion | ||
|---|---|---|
| Grade | ||
| Overall score | E3.4 | B6.8 |
| Payouts | 0.0 | 7.7 |
| Transparency | 1.7 | 4.8 |
| Rules & trading conditions | 8.4 | 6.5 |
| Reputation | 2.2 | 7.4 |
| Platforms & execution | 6.4 | 7.0 |
| Support | 3.9 | 7.2 |
| Evidence | ||
| Trustpilot | ≈2.2(estimate; Trustpilot hides this firm's score) (1.2K) | 4.7 (1.8K) |
| Pass rate | 8%Estimate | 10%Estimate |
| Hidden risk | 6.9 Very highHidden risk 6.9 out of 10, Very high | 4.4 HighHidden risk 4.4 out of 10, High |
| Negative recent reviews | 80.5% | 7.5% |
| Offer | ||
| $100K challenge | $279.20 | — |
| Cheapest account | $20 | $94 |
| Max allocation | $400K | $750K |
| Max profit split | 100% | 100% |
| Payouts | Every 14 days by default… | Master: weekly, every Wednesday… |
| Programs | instant, 1-step, 2-step | 1-step, instant |
| Current offer | — | DEAL· BULENOX |
| Company | ||
| Headquarters | Dubai, United Arab Emirates | Wilmington, Delaware, United States |
| Years in business | 3 | 5 |
| Trading | ||
| Platforms | MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker, Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView | Rithmic, NinjaTrader, Quantower |
| Assets | Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Energies, Crypto, Futures | Futures, Indices, Commodities, Energies, Metals, Crypto, Forex |
| EAs | Restricted | Restricted |
| News trading | Restricted | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | Restricted | Not allowed |
| Copy trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Hedging | Restricted | Restricted |
Which should you choose?
By trading style
| You are… | Pick | |
|---|---|---|
| Beginners | Bulenox | Discounted evaluations are cheap to retry, but Rithmic setup, the activation fee and the 10-day payout rules are a lot to learn. |
| Experienced traders | Either | AquaFunded: Low prices and no time limits suit disciplined traders who audit every rule for their model and accept manual payout reviews and a 3% payout fee. |
| Swing traders | AquaFunded | Overnight and weekend holding is allowed on CFDs and 2-Step Standard or Elite have static drawdowns, but -1% to -2% floating-loss limits rule out wide stops on funded and instant accounts. |
| Scalpers | Bulenox | No minimum hold time, news is open and micro contracts cost $0.61 per side, though trailing drawdowns punish give-backs. |
| EA & algo traders | Bulenox | Personal bots and copiers are allowed, but third-party API access costs $100 a month and high-frequency algos are barred. |
| News traders | Bulenox | CPI, FOMC and NFP are open on every program with no blackout window. |
Verdicts
AquaFunded verdict
Cheap challenges wrapped in a dense, shifting rulebook and a damaged reputation
Best for: Disciplined traders with small, steady risk per trade who want cheap 2-step pricing, no time limits and a choice of four CFD platforms, and who will read every rule for their model.
Avoid if: You scalp, trade news, run EAs on a VPS, share a network with other traders, or need a firm with a clean, verifiable payout reputation.
Bulenox verdict
Cheap futures evaluations with real payouts, but an unpublished flipping rule decides who gets paid
Best for: Intraday futures traders who trade meaningful size every day, want very cheap evaluations and can live with weekly payouts and several consistency checks.
Avoid if: You need overnight holds, trade on a Mac or TradingView, or want every payout condition published before you buy.
AquaFunded vs Bulenox FAQ
Questions traders ask
Is AquaFunded better than Bulenox?
On our grading Bulenox scores higher overall (6.8 vs 3.4, grade B vs E). AquaFunded still comes out ahead on conditions. The better choice depends on your style: compare the rules rows above before buying.
Which is cheaper, AquaFunded or Bulenox?
The cheapest accounts start at $20 at AquaFunded and $94 at Bulenox. Prices depend on program and size, so compare the challenges tables.
Which pays out more reliably, AquaFunded or Bulenox?
Bulenox has the stronger payout score (AquaFunded 0.0 vs Bulenox 7.7). AquaFunded pays every 14 days by default; 7-day cycles (evaluations) or on-demand requests (instant) as paid add-ons; futures models pay on demand, daily or every 5-6 winning days; Bulenox pays master: weekly, every wednesday. fast track and momentum: same day for weekday requests before 12:01 pm ct.
Which has fewer hidden rules, AquaFunded or Bulenox?
Bulenox has the lower Hidden Risk score (AquaFunded 6.9, very high; Bulenox 4.4, high). Each review lists the specific rules behind the score.
Is it easier to pass AquaFunded or Bulenox?
AquaFunded: 8% (estimate). Bulenox: 10% (estimate). Estimates are a guide to difficulty only; drawdown type and daily loss rules matter as much as the target.
Compare AquaFunded or Bulenox with another firm
More head-to-heads
- Bulenox vs Top One Futures
- Bulenox vs FundedNext
- Bulenox vs IQ Capital
- Bulenox vs FXIFY
- Alpha Futures vs Bulenox
- AquaFunded vs Hola Prime
- Bulenox vs Take Profit Trader
- Bulenox vs Lucid Trading
- Bulenox vs Tradeify
- AquaFunded vs Atlas Funded
- Bulenox vs Funded Futures Family
- Bulenox vs E8 Markets
- AquaFunded vs For Traders
- AquaFunded vs Blue Guardian
- AquaFunded vs FundedNext
- AquaFunded vs FXIFY
- AquaFunded vs Goat Funded Trader
- Bulenox vs Instant Funding