Head to head
Blueberry Funded vs For Traders
For Traders grades higher overall, 4.8 to 4.0. Across 21 measurable rows, Blueberry Funded comes out ahead on 3 and For Traders on 10.
Cheap and broker-backed, but a hidden TrustScore and breach-before-payout complaints are hard to ignore
Cheap to start and quick with small rewards, but the funded-stage rules and contract favor the house
Key differences
In short
- A $100K evaluation is cheaper at For Traders ($289 vs $450 at Blueberry Funded).
- Blueberry Funded carries more hidden-rule risk (6.6 vs 5.7), led by: vague "toxic trading" and "bad faith" findings used to breach profitable accounts.
- Blueberry Funded allows more capital ($2,000,000 vs $300,000).
- cTrader, Proprietary are only available at For Traders.
Blueberry Funded vs For Traders, side by side
The better value in each row is marked
| Criterion | ||
|---|---|---|
| Grade | ||
| Overall score | E4.0 | D4.8 |
| Payouts | 3.7 | 3.7 |
| Transparency | 3.6 | 4.4 |
| Rules & trading conditions | 5.3 | 7.0 |
| Reputation | 2.8 | 3.3 |
| Platforms & execution | 4.1 | 6.1 |
| Support | 5.0 | 5.7 |
| Evidence | ||
| Trustpilot | ≈3.4(estimate; Trustpilot hides this firm's score) (1.7K) | ≈4.1(estimate; Trustpilot hides this firm's score) (1.8K) |
| Pass rate | 12%Estimate | 8%Estimate |
| Hidden risk | 6.6 Very highHidden risk 6.6 out of 10, Very high | 5.7 Very highHidden risk 5.7 out of 10, Very high |
| Negative recent reviews | 19% | 18.5% |
| Offer | ||
| $100K challenge | $450 | $289 |
| Cheapest account | $25 | $49 |
| Max allocation | $2M | $300K |
| Max profit split | 90% | 90% |
| Payouts | Bi-weekly by default… | On demand on Pay After Pass, Crypto Fast PRO and all… |
| Programs | instant, 1-step, 2-step | 1-step, 2-step, instant |
| Current offer | 22% OFF· BERRY22 | 20% OFF· NEW20 |
| Company | ||
| Headquarters | Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Dubai, United Arab Emirates |
| Years in business | 2 | 3 |
| Trading | ||
| Platforms | MT5, TradeLocker | MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Proprietary |
| Assets | Forex, Metals, Indices, Crypto, Commodities | Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Energies, Crypto, Futures |
| EAs | Restricted | Restricted |
| News trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Restricted | Restricted |
| Copy trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Hedging | Not allowed | Not allowed |
Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Dubai, United Arab EmiratesWhich should you choose?
By trading style
| You are… | Pick | |
|---|---|---|
| Beginners | For Traders | A $9 Pay After Pass entry, $49 6K challenges and no time limits make cheap practice, but the Master-stage rules (2% floating-loss cut, 20% consistency, 3% buffer) are where inexperienced traders lose accounts. |
| Experienced traders | Blueberry Funded | Static drawdowns and clear numeric targets suit an experienced trader's process, but this is the group most often reported breached once an account turns consistently profitable. |
| Swing traders | Either | Blueberry Funded: Weekend and overnight holding are allowed on every program except 1-Step Flex, but one large winning day can trip the 15-30% consistency rule on Instant Lite and Synthetic. |
| Scalpers | Either | Blueberry Funded: Tick scalping and high-frequency trading are explicitly banned, and funded accounts carry a 5-minute minimum hold on every position. |
| EA & algo traders | Either | Blueberry Funded: Only self-coded EAs that execute the trader's own decisions are allowed, commercial and third-party EAs are banned outright, and false-positive "automated execution" breaches are a recurring complaint. |
| News traders | For Traders | News trading is free in challenges and on crypto and futures, but forex Master and Instant accounts cannot open trades 5 minutes either side of high-impact releases. |
Verdicts
Blueberry Funded verdict
Cheap and broker-backed, but a hidden TrustScore and breach-before-payout complaints are hard to ignore
Best for: Disciplined manual swing and day traders who keep risk well under 1% per idea, avoid EAs and news trades, and want cheap entry fees with no time limit.
Avoid if: You scalp, run EAs or third-party signals, trade news, or need certainty that a profitable account won't be challenged on a discretionary "toxic trading" call.
For Traders verdict
Cheap to start and quick with small rewards, but the funded-stage rules and contract favor the house
Best for: Budget-minded forex, crypto or futures traders who size small, withdraw modest amounts regularly and can live with consistency rules and a 2% open-loss ceiling.
Avoid if: You scalp trades under five seconds, run autonomous EAs or copy trades in, sit through wide floating drawdowns, or are counting on large payouts surviving a discretionary risk review.
Blueberry Funded vs For Traders FAQ
Questions traders ask
Is Blueberry Funded better than For Traders?
On our grading For Traders scores higher overall (4.8 vs 4.0, grade D vs E). The better choice depends on your style: compare the rules rows above before buying.
Which is cheaper, Blueberry Funded or For Traders?
At list price a $100K evaluation costs $450 at Blueberry Funded and $289 at For Traders, so For Traders is cheaper. The smallest accounts start at $25 and $49. Discounts change often, so check the offers page.
Which pays out more reliably, Blueberry Funded or For Traders?
Blueberry Funded has the stronger payout score (Blueberry Funded 3.7 vs For Traders 3.7). Blueberry Funded pays bi-weekly by default; weekly or on-demand available as a paid add-on; For Traders pays on demand on pay after pass, crypto fast pro and all futures accounts; every 14 days on fast, fast static, classic, instant and instant pro.
Which has fewer hidden rules, Blueberry Funded or For Traders?
For Traders has the lower Hidden Risk score (Blueberry Funded 6.6, very high; For Traders 5.7, very high). Each review lists the specific rules behind the score.
Is it easier to pass Blueberry Funded or For Traders?
Blueberry Funded: 12% (estimate). For Traders: 8% (estimate). Estimates are a guide to difficulty only; drawdown type and daily loss rules matter as much as the target.
Compare Blueberry Funded or For Traders with another firm
More head-to-heads
- For Traders vs The5ers
- For Traders vs Hola Prime
- For Traders vs FundedNext
- For Traders vs IQ Capital
- For Traders vs Top One Trader
- Core Funded vs For Traders
- For Traders vs FXIFY
- AquaFunded vs For Traders
- For Traders vs Goat Funded Trader
- Blue Guardian vs For Traders
- For Traders vs Maven Trading
- Blueberry Funded vs FundedNext
- Blueberry Funded vs Core Funded
- Blueberry Funded vs FXIFY
- Blue Guardian vs Blueberry Funded
- For Traders vs Instant Funding