Skip to contentVerified prop firm discountsSee offers
PropFirmGrades

Head to head · Oct 2026

AquaFunded vs FundingPips

FundingPips grades higher overall, 5.9 to 4.7. Across 21 measurable rows, AquaFunded comes out ahead on 3 and FundingPips on 10.

D

Cheap challenges wrapped in a dense, shifting rulebook and a damaged reputation

C

FundingPips pays fast and sells cheap, but 2026's rule churn and device-ID bans demand caution

Key differences

In short

  • A $100K evaluation is cheaper at AquaFunded ($279.20 vs $444 at FundingPips).
  • FundingPips has the stronger payout record (6.5 vs 5.0).
  • AquaFunded carries more hidden-rule risk (7.0 vs 5.8), led by: floating-loss caps close accounts instantly.
  • TradeLocker, Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView are only available at AquaFunded.

AquaFunded vs FundingPips, side by side

The better value in each row is marked

AquaFunded vs FundingPips compared
Criterion
Grade
Overall scoreD4.7C5.9
Payouts5.06.5
Rules & transparency3.54.5
Reputation3.05.5
Trading conditions6.06.5
Support5.56.0
Platforms & execution6.56.5
Evidence
TrustpilotHidden (1.2K)4.5 (70K)
Pass rate8%Estimate10%Estimate
Hidden risk
7.0 Very highHidden risk 7.0 out of 10, Very high
5.8 Very highHidden risk 5.8 out of 10, Very high
Negative recent reviews80.5%12.5%
Offer
$100K challenge$279.20$444
Cheapest account$20$33
Max allocation$400K$400K
Max profit split100%100%
PayoutsEvery 14 days by default…Weekly (2 Step Pro at 80%, 2 Step Standard at 60%)…
Programsinstant, 1-step, 2-stepinstant, 1-step, 2-step
Current offer25% OFF· AUTUMN10% OFF· FP
Company
Headquarters Dubai, United Arab Emirates Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Years in business34
Trading
PlatformsMT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker, Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingViewMT5, cTrader, Match-Trader
AssetsForex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Energies, Crypto, FuturesForex, Indices, Metals, Energies, Crypto
EAsRestrictedRestricted
News tradingRestrictedRestricted
Weekend holdingRestrictedRestricted
Copy tradingRestrictedRestricted
HedgingRestrictedNot allowed

Which should you choose?

By trading style

Fit by trading style
You are…Pick
BeginnersFundingPips
Experienced tradersEither
Swing tradersAquaFunded
ScalpersFundingPips
EA & algo tradersEither
News tradersEither

Verdicts

AquaFunded verdict

Cheap challenges wrapped in a dense, shifting rulebook and a damaged reputation

Best for: Disciplined traders with small, steady risk per trade who want cheap 2-step pricing, no time limits and a choice of four CFD platforms, and who will read every rule for their model.

Avoid if: You scalp, trade news, run EAs on a VPS, share a network with other traders, or need a firm with a clean, verifiable payout reputation.

FundingPips verdict

FundingPips pays fast and sells cheap, but 2026's rule churn and device-ID bans demand caution

Best for: Disciplined intraday forex traders on one personal device who want cheap 2-step entry and weekly or bi-weekly payouts

Avoid if: You hold trades overnight without the Swing add-on, share devices or networks with other traders, run EAs on a VPS, or trade news

AquaFunded vs FundingPips FAQ

Questions traders ask

Is AquaFunded better than FundingPips?

On our grading FundingPips scores higher overall (5.9 vs 4.7, grade C vs D). The better choice depends on your style: compare the rules rows above before buying.

Which is cheaper, AquaFunded or FundingPips?

At list price a $100K evaluation costs $279.20 at AquaFunded and $444 at FundingPips, so AquaFunded is cheaper. The smallest accounts start at $20 and $33. Discounts change often, so check the offers page.

Which pays out more reliably, AquaFunded or FundingPips?

FundingPips has the stronger payout score (AquaFunded 5.0 vs FundingPips 6.5). AquaFunded pays every 14 days by default; 7-day cycles (evaluations) or on-demand requests (instant) as paid add-ons; futures models pay on demand, daily or every 5-6 winning days; FundingPips pays weekly (2 step pro at 80%, 2 step standard at 60%), bi-weekly (80% on flex models and 2 step standard, 95% on 2 step flex 95% and zero), on-demand 90% (2 step standard) and monthly 100% on challenge models with conditions.

Which has fewer hidden rules, AquaFunded or FundingPips?

FundingPips has the lower Hidden Risk score (AquaFunded 7.0, very high; FundingPips 5.8, very high). Each review lists the specific rules behind the score.

Is it easier to pass AquaFunded or FundingPips?

AquaFunded: 8% (estimate). FundingPips: 10% (estimate). Estimates are a guide to difficulty only; drawdown type and daily loss rules matter as much as the target.

Compare AquaFunded or FundingPips with another firm

More head-to-heads